How We Research & Review Content
Qerano’s actual workflow: topic selection, multiple sources, drafting, claim and URL checks, local SEO, publication gates, corrections and updates.
From a reader’s question to a draft
We define the question, intended audience and search intent, then check for overlap with existing coverage. We compare multiple sources before drafting; a search result or a product’s marketing claim is not sufficient medical evidence.
Medical claims and source URLs
Health articles require at least five reliable sources, including three high-priority sources. We favour NIH, PubMed, MedlinePlus, NHS, CDC, FDA, medical institutions and professional societies. Important claims carry numbered citations. The record stores the organisation, title, direct URL, known date and access date. Unsupported claims must be removed rather than given an invented source.
A working URL shows availability, not factual reliability. Automated URL checks and publication gates cannot replace reading the source or qualified clinical review. The current catalogue has been checked with AI-assisted editorial tools; it has not received independent medical review.
Writing and localisation
The English article is the editorial starting point. After its review, German and Russian versions are prepared with natural language and separate SEO wording. Medical facts, measurements, study conclusions, citations and warnings must remain consistent. The translationKey connects corresponding versions.
Before publication
Checks cover title, description, headings, sources, claims, image and alt, relevant internal links, canonical, hreflang and translation completeness. Images follow our editorial selection rules; generated scenes are labelled. We do not invent authors, testing experience, prices, ratings or commercial offers.
Updates and corrections
New evidence, a broken source or an identified error triggers review. We record substantial changes and recheck affected translations. There is no claim that every source is continuously monitored or that a successful automated audit proves clinical accuracy.
See the editorial team, commercial disclosure and correction contact instructions.